Kristina Zvonar BrkicImagine a medical device failing at a critical moment due to a substandard component — a scenario no company or patient wants to face. This is where ISO 13485 purchasing controls become indispensable. In the high-stakes world of medical devices, ensuring that every product and service sourced from external suppliers meets stringent quality and regulatory standards is not just a best practice — it’s a necessity. With that in mind, how can an organization best leverage these purchasing controls to safeguard product integrity and patient trust?
The purchasing control procedures outlined in ISO 13485 require organizations to manage and verify the quality of materials, parts, or services from suppliers, making purchasing control a critical aspect of the overall Quality Management System (QMS). In medical device manufacturing, even small defects in materials can affect product safety, so these controls help organizations avoid risks associated with substandard components.
What are ISO 13485 purchasing controls?
ISO 13485 purchasing control requirements specify several essential steps that organizations must follow to ensure high quality standards in their supply chain. The primary requirements include supplier evaluation and selection, purchasing information, verification of purchased products, ongoing monitoring, and documentation of purchasing activities — the next section describes each of these in more detail.
Implementing purchasing control procedures helps organizations maintain a standardized approach to supplier management, enhancing product consistency, reliability, and safety.
How to implement ISO 13485 purchasing controls
The need for ISO 13485 purchasing controls stems from the following purposes: to ensure compliance with regulatory and statutory requirements, to mitigate risks associated with defective or inconsistent materials, and to help maintain consistency and reliability in the final product. Effective purchasing controls also optimize supplier relationships, setting clear quality expectations and improving the overall supply chain efficiency.
Supplier evaluation and selection. ISO 13485 mandates that organizations establish criteria to select suppliers capable of consistently meeting quality and regulatory standards. To meet these requirements, a purchasing control checklist can be used to evaluate suppliers based on quality certifications, history of performance, and reliability.
For example, a company manufacturing sterile surgical instruments may require that suppliers of stainless steel meet specific quality certifications, such as ISO 9001. This supplier selection process not only helps maintain quality but also streamlines compliance with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) purchasing control requirements, which similarly mandate that suppliers meet established standards to ensure safety and effectiveness in medical devices.
Documentation and communication with suppliers. Once suppliers are selected, clear and thorough purchasing information must be documented and communicated. Purchasing information ensures that suppliers understand the required quality specifications, regulatory standards, and any special handling or packaging instructions. Organizations should incorporate these specifications into their purchasing control best practices, ensuring that expectations are consistent.
For instance, a company purchasing electronic components for pacemakers would specify requirements for durability, testing, and traceability in the purchasing documents. By including detailed instructions, the organization can minimize the risk of receiving nonconforming products and facilitate seamless FDA purchasing control compliance.
Verification of purchased products. This crucial step ensures that procured items meet the requirements outlined in purchasing information before they are used in production. Verification may include incoming inspections, product testing, or requiring supplier-provided certificates of conformance. For example, an organization manufacturing infusion pumps may conduct incoming inspections on tubing materials to verify flexibility and strength.
Alternatively, for items where testing may be complex or costly, the organization could request testing certificates directly from the supplier, especially if past supplier performance indicates reliability. Incorporating verification steps into the purchasing control checklist reduces the risk of introducing nonconforming products into production, a critical aspect of both ISO 13485 and FDA purchasing control.
Monitoring and re-evaluation of suppliers. The purchasing control best practices under ISO 13485 also emphasize ongoing monitoring and re-evaluation of suppliers. This requirement helps ensure that suppliers maintain the quality standards set during the initial evaluation. Organizations often use quality audits, periodic reviews, and performance assessments to monitor supplier quality.
For example, a medical device company might track defect rates and returns associated with components provided by a particular supplier and use this information to decide whether to continue or reevaluate the supplier relationship. Continuous monitoring ensures compliance with ISO 13485 and FDA purchasing control requirements and provides a proactive approach to managing supplier risk.
Documentation of activities. Finally, documentation of all purchasing control activities is critical for traceability and compliance. Keeping records of supplier evaluations, purchasing information, verification processes, and corrective actions allows organizations to demonstrate compliance during internal audits or regulatory inspections. For example, if an organization detects a defect in a batch of electronic sensors, the incident and any corrective actions taken, such as working with the supplier to address the issue, should be documented. This documentation serves as evidence of ISO 13485 purchasing control compliance and is essential for meeting FDA purchasing control requirements.
Comparing purchasing controls: ISO 13485 vs. FDA requirements
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the regulatory body that oversees the safety and effectiveness of medical devices in the United States. It mandates strict compliance with its Quality System Regulation (QSR), which includes purchasing controls similar to those in ISO 13485.
While both ISO 13485 and the FDA Quality System Regulation (QSR) underscore the importance of having a rigorous purchasing control system, the differences between the two largely lie in the documentation requirements.
- The FDA specifically mandates a formal documented process for the evaluation, acceptance, and re-evaluation of suppliers, contractors, and consultants.
- While ISO 13485 does require documentation of the results of supplier evaluations, it does not explicitly state the need for maintaining a list of acceptable suppliers.
These controls ensure the quality of components and services procured for manufacturing medical devices. Non-compliance can result in penalties, recalls, and loss of market access.
Conclusion
Both ISO 13485 and FDA purchasing controls play a crucial role in ensuring product quality and building trust with customers and stakeholders.
To comply with these regulations, it is essential to implement a thorough supplier evaluation process. This involves setting specific criteria for assessing suppliers, conducting initial evaluations, and performing regular re-evaluations to ensure ongoing compliance and performance. Once robust purchasing controls are in place, manufacturers must continuously monitor and refine these controls to uphold their commitment to quality and patient safety.
Simplify implementation of ISO 13485 controls using our ISO 13485 Documentation Toolkit.
