• (0)
    ISO-13485-blog

    ISO 13485 & MDR Knowledge base

    Infographic: EU MDR vs. MDD – What has changed?

    The Medical Device Directive (MDD) was first published in 1993. Since then, it has remained unchanged, although different European standards and guidance (particularly MEDDEV) have been continuously updated during this almost 30 years. Very often, this was rather confusing for the manufacturers because they did not know which medical device regulations needed to be followed.

    In addition, given how much medicine has advanced in the past 30 years, it is logical that the regulations that allow medical devices to be placed on the EU market should be adjusted accordingly. All of this has led to the creation of a new regulation for medical devices – the EU Medical Device Regulation.

     

    Infographic: EU MDR vs. MDD – What has changed? - 13485Academy

     

    History of the Medical Device Directive

    The Medical Device Directive – MDD – (Directive 93/42/EEC) was published in 1993. Its intention was:

    1. to harmonise the laws and standards relating to design and manufacturing medical devices within the European Union
    2. to ensure that medical devices are safe for patients

    Devices that are in conformity with the relevant harmonised standards, or the relevant parts of those standards, are presumed to be in conformity with the requirements of the Medical Device Directive (MDD). Products conforming to the MDD must have the CE mark.

    The directive was reviewed and amended by the 2007/47/EC, and a number of changes were made. Compliance with the revised directive became mandatory on 21 March 2010. On 5 April 2017, a new regulation on medical devices was adopted: the Medical Device Regulation – MDR – 2017/745.

    Alignment

    Medical devices must comply with strict health and safety requirements set out in the legislation. “Harmonised standard“ means a European standard as defined in point (1)(c) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012. The list of currently valid harmonised standards is published by the Official Journal of the European Union.

    Transition period

    Due to the Covid-19 situation, the transition period for the EU MDR has been postponed. On 23 April 2020, Council and the Parliament adopted Regulation 2020/561 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices, with regard to the dates of application of certain provisions. The start of the complete application of the MDR is scheduled for 26 May 2021.

    Comparison

    In the MDR, no existing requirements have been removed, but the MDR adds new requirements. There are 23 articles in the MDD, while in the MDR there are 123 articles. In the MDD there are 12 Annexes, while in the MDR there are 17 annexes.

    Requirements

    The scope of the new MDR has been changed: active implantable medical devices, ancillary medicinal products, and devices incorporating non-viable human tissues are now included. Also added are all devices for cleaning, sterilisation, or disinfecting (Article 2.1), reprocessed single-use medical devices (Article 17), and certain devices with no intended medical purpose (Annex XVI).

    Similarities and differences

    In the EU MDR, new stakeholders have been identified in the lifecycle of the medical device (in addition to the manufacturer), and the obligations for them have been defined in detail: authorised representative (Art. 11), importer (Art. 13), distributor (Art. 14).

    There is one new class of medical device – reusable instruments (Ir) – which is a new sub-class for products that are reprocessed.

    Classification rules have been changed – in the MDD there were 18 rules, while in the MDR there are 22 rules. Some rules have tightened and changed for some products, which has resulted in some devices being reclassified into higher classes. Rule 11 was changed, and now includes a rule that considers software to be a medical device. These requirements should be evaluated carefully to determine potential new classifications. If software can cause death or an irreversible deterioration of a person’s state of health, then it is in class III.

    There are 4 new rules: Rule 19 – Devices incorporating or consisting of nanomaterial; Rule 20 – Invasive devices with respect to body orifices to administer medicinal products by inhalation; Rule 21 – Substances or combinations of substances that are intended to be introduced into the human body via a body orifice or applied to the skin and that are absorbed; and Rule 22 – Active therapeutic devices with an integrated or incorporated diagnostic function which significantly determines the patient management.

    Medical devices that are classified under Rule 21 will have a different classification depending on different factors. They are classified as class III if the human body systemically absorbs them in order to achieve the intended purpose—that is, if they achieve their intended purpose in the stomach or lower gastrointestinal tract and the human body systemically absorbs them.

    All devices incorporating or consisting of nanomaterial are classified as class III if they present a high or medium potential for internal exposure. Active therapeutic devices with an integrated or incorporated diagnostic function that significantly determines the patient management by the device, such as closed-loop systems or automated external defibrillators, are classified as class III.

    The MDR now specifies that a person must be responsible for regulatory compliance, who this person can be, what knowledge is necessary, and what obligations and responsibilities this person has.

    Requirements for clinical evaluation (Chapter VI, Annex XIV), clinical investigation (Chapter VI, Annex XV), and post-market surveillance system (Chapter VII, Annex III) are more detailed.

    The MDR has established a unique device identification (UDI) system to adequately identify medical devices sold in the EU market. The intention of the UDI is to provide single, globally harmonised, positive identification of medical devices through distribution and use, requiring the labels of devices to bear a globally unique device identifier.

    What does the MDR bring for medical device manufacturers?

    The MDR brings more strict requirements, but with the intention to prove medical device safety for both patients and users. Manufacturers must meet as many obligations and new regulations as possible so that both the device and the manufacturer comply with the MDR.

    All manufacturers need to have implemented a Quality Management System and, since ISO 13485:2016 is the only Quality Management System standard on the list of harmonised standards published in the Official Journal of the European Union, it is expected for all manufacturers to have implemented this standard.

    The requirements for technical documentation are described in much more detail, making it easier for the manufacturer in the preparation of the documents themselves and in the approach to defining the necessary tests.

    Advisera Kristina Zvonar Brkic
    Author
    Kristina Zvonar Brkic
    Kristina Zvonar Brkic has worked as a consultant and lead auditor for ISO 13485, ISO 9001, and ISO 22716 for more than 10 years. She has also worked as an auditor and assessor for medical devices under MDD for 7 years, and currently MDR. The portfolio of medical devices for which she has approval are plastic products with measuring function, various creams and gels, different systems for wound care, disinfectants, dental materials, different catheters, panels for operating rooms and clean rooms, accessories and kits for performing surgical procedures of non-woven materials, medical gases, and various dental materials.